Overview
Transformer architectures differ in how they process and generate text. The choice between encoder-only, decoder-only, and encoder-decoder models involves trade-offs in capability, efficiency, and task suitability.
Architectural comparison
- Encoder-only: Bidirectional attention, no generation - best for understanding tasks
- Decoder-only: Causal attention, autoregressive generation - best for text generation
- Encoder-decoder: Full encoder + causal decoder - best for seq2seq tasks
When to use each
- Classification: Encoder-only models
- Text generation: Decoder-only models
- Translation: Encoder-decoder models
- Summarization: Encoder-decoder models
- Embeddings: Encoder-only models
- Chat/completion: Decoder-only models
Efficiency considerations
- Encoder-only: Fast encoding, encoding only at inference
- Decoder-only: Variable speed, cache growth during generation
- Encoder-decoder: Encoder + decode time, full encoder benefit
Parameter considerations
- Encoder-only: Moderate parameters
- Decoder-only: Scales well with size
- Encoder-decoder: Higher total parameters